Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Lingster
KeymasterI love her so much.
Lingster
KeymasterI'm trying to get Brawna & Shulkie back up – maybe tomorrow. I've had trouble with the moves.
May 19, 2007 at 7:23 pm in reply to: Mozilla browsers reach parity on Amaz0ns with Internet Explorer #51316Lingster
KeymasterOpera is an excellent browser. Safari is also very good, but is not as feature rich as others.
I usually run Safari as a backup, just as I do with Camino (a Mozilla browser similar to Firefox). For example, if I want to be signed in as an Amaz0ns administrator and a guest at the same time, I'll run Firefox as the admin's browser and then Safari or Camino as the guest's. Camino and Safari are also much lighter than Firefox, and so they run faster on my increasingly geriatric Mac.
On my PC, I use Opera as the backup, because it's more reliable than Internet Explorer. Also, Opera is the native browser on the Wii, and its PDA and portable versions are exceptional.
Lingster
KeymasterThis has really been a pain in the ass. I'm in the process of moving the other sites to eApps, where I have been putting most of my clients and non-musclegirl-related sites the last few months, but while eApps offers great memory options, their bandwidth options are inferior to PowerVPS, where Amaz0ns is currently hosted.
Amaz0ns is consuming about 200 gigabytes of bandwidth per month, which is more than twice the bandwidth allowed under eApps $80/month plan. So we'll see what happens. (eApps memory allocation is three times the one we have with PowerVPS, though.)
Lingster
KeymasterWe're not out of the woods yet – the site crashed again during the night. It looks like it runs for two or three hours at a stretch now, and then crashes. It might be manageable. What I'll do in the meantime is move Shulkie and Brawna to a new webhost, and hope that the slice Amaz0ns is on will suffice if that's the only site on it.
I would hate to move Amaz0ns again – the workload involved would be significant because the site has so many third party and modified components.
Lingster
KeymasterI nearly split my gut watching this:
[html][/html]
Lingster
KeymasterDon't make me prove you wrong O_o
A cylinder 43 inches around would have a diameter of a little more than 13 5/8". Since a calf is not a cylinder it would bulge significantly more to the rear and sides than 13 5/8". Let's call it 16" at its widest point. That means to walk properly the lower legs would need to be positioned at least 1.5 feet apart.
I am 6' tall and I tried that – I walked like my grandfather shortly before he died.
And if we assume a proportionate musculature in the thighs, walking would be totally impossible.
Lingster
KeymasterEverything in those magazines is a lie. Don't worry about it.
Lingster
KeymasterExcuse me Lingster – I only agreed that it had irriatated me in the past. I didn't ask for it to be lowered to 30 seconds (not being rude to The_Collector_2, just saying).
If I find something that looks like spam, I'll flag it (how does one go about doing that?), but I'm far too busy now to spend very long on here, certainly too busy to take on a 'quota'.Well, I am happy to have taught you a valuable life lesson called "the law of unintended consequences".
Lingster
KeymasterOK, it's 30 seconds now. But if a spambot comes in and drops 120 messages on the site in an hour, then you two will be responsible for flagging 80 of them.
-
AuthorPosts