Reason

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 71 through 80 (of 902 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Alina Popa #100332
    Reason
    Participant

    CptMatt wrote:

    FlakBait wrote:

    a rare update from Katka’s twitter
    [IMG]http://i53.tinypic.com/28bbt3p.jpg[/IMG]

    There’s a pic to set hearts aflutter, Ms Hrepca and Ms Popa, side by side. :laugh: 🙂

    Wow, the Universe survived after all ;)! I guess it’s tougher than I thought!

    This picture also puts into perspective just how big Kat has gotten. Just amazing :woohoo:!

    in reply to: Natalia Romashko #100093
    Reason
    Participant

    cpbell0033944 wrote:

    Wow, what a pretty musclebabe! As was said previously, she has the face of a slim girl-next-door and the body of a muscle goddess. B)

    If you think she has the face of the girl-next-door, I think I’d better move to your neighbourhood :ohmy:!

    in reply to: 2011 NY Pro Women’s Bodybuilding Show Cancelled #99987
    Reason
    Participant

    I get the feeling the IFBB is pretty much at war with the Female Bodybuilding community and this Women’s Physique Division is their final solution. I’m starting to think that the future is pay per view, web-only competitions.

    In any case, I think the IFBB is making a mistake. Even if the WPD is a big success and it leads to the demise of Female Bodybuilding as it currently stands, all they will have done is reset the physiques back to how they were in the late 70s, early 80s. As the women get bigger and more muscular each year, which is the natural result of such a competition, there will be nothing stopping history repeating itself, and within 10-20 years, they’ll find themselves having to think about creating another division all over again!

    IMO, they are much better off keeping Female Bodybuilding alive, so competitors have somewhere to go if they get too big for WPD, otherwise the level of muscularity will just keep rising within the WPD.

    in reply to: Batman Reboot Being Planned After Dark Knight Rise #99920
    Reason
    Participant

    It’s fair enough that WB will want to another Batman movie in 2-3 years after Dark Knight Rises. Nolan does not want to direct, so the only alternative would be for someone else to direct a sequel set in Nolan’s Batman universe, which would surely reflect more poorly on Nolan’s films than a standalone reboot.

    By the way, I don’t think a reboot has to be an origin story, which has pretty much been done to death. It might just be some original story featuring the Batman characters.

    in reply to: David E. Kelley’s Wonder Woman TV Pilot Script #99919
    Reason
    Participant

    Sorry, GWHH. I appreciate the trouble you’ve gone to to post all of these images, but imagebam keeps showing this picture of a girl that I just can no longer stomach. So much so, that I’ve stopped clicking on them. Please use another image hosting website! There must be dozens to choose from!

    in reply to: Batman Reboot Being Planned After Dark Knight Rise #99914
    Reason
    Participant

    I remember the first time I ever heard the term “reboot” was in reference to the then upcoming Batman Begins film, and that didn’t turn out too badly. It was certainly better than Batman 5 would have been!

    I think they are a great way to go in a new direction with the characters, but I would hate to see just a rehash of what Nolan did. What I would really like to see is an old and grisly Batman, like in Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns comic.

    in reply to: David E. Kelley’s Wonder Woman TV Pilot Script #99905
    Reason
    Participant

    FlakBait wrote:

    So here are some set photos from the pilot. The outfit doesn’t look anywhere near as bad as the promo pic……..unfortunately it’s still not great and seems to be in need of some “padding”

    [/URL][/URL][/URL]

    Oh man, I always get this ominous feeling of dread whenever I see that this topic has been updated.

    I’m glad to see that they at least got rid of the ridiculous shiny spandex tights she was wearing in the promo pic, but there is still so much wrong with this project, it hardly matters.

    At least the stunt double has the sort of muscle tone I would expect for Wonder Woman, but it might cause some discontinuity between shots. I wonder if they’ll try to work an explanation into the script, like her muscles only show when she’s in danger or something :).

    in reply to: 1st look at the redesigned Thundercats #99758
    Reason
    Participant

    FlakBait wrote:

    Trailer for the new series
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KGj6KGeUto&feature=related

    “The uploader has not made this video available in your country.”

    For a preview? Really?

    Note sure if this is the exact same clip, but at least this one seems to work outside of the US.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWrh1axPj0M

    Looks, for lack of a better word, epic! Also, Cheetara looks a bit more buff when she’s in action, compared to some of the promo art. I can live with that sort of compromise.

    in reply to: Where did… X author go/any future plans? #99748
    Reason
    Participant

    I was going to write a post about about Dmaynard, but he just posted a second part to Web Cam Muscle after almost 2 years!

    http://www.thevalkyrie.com/stories/1misc30/webcam2.txt

    I should warn you though, it is very violent, and there’s no growth.

    in reply to: Natalia Romashko #99742
    Reason
    Participant

    Solarian, aka LordDaroth wrote:

    Reason wrote:
    If you like big-headed gals, that’s fine, but Nataliya is actually a perfect 8 heads tall.

    Average people are 7 heads tall.

    That’s most likely true, but to quote artist, Andrew Loomis, “7 heads tall looks rather dumpy” :).

    I’ve done my own studies, and I’ve noticed that athletic looking people tend to be higher than the average. I think that’s why 8 heads is often used by artists as an artistic ideal rather than the statistically average 7 heads tall.

Viewing 10 posts - 71 through 80 (of 902 total)