Seldom

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 150 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Katie Easterwood #101121
    Seldom
    Participant

    Ohh myy

    in reply to: New glitch, new She-Hulk topic… #100919
    Seldom
    Participant

    That Aleesha Hulk is seriously awesome, both the hulk version and the regular morph.

    in reply to: CNET News – WH wants new copyright law crackdown #99644
    Seldom
    Participant

    Copyright is not supposed to be anything. It’s an artificial restriction created for the purpose of promoting creative works.

    At the time of its invention, copyright was thought of as a useful idea. Science in its current form was in its early days. Copyright was not the product of investigation into what would promote creative works; it was the product of political philosophy.

    Since then, copyright has become largely ideological, but it did not start as such. Its origins are strictly utilitarian, but not evidence-based.

    The first U.S. federal copyright law was the Copyright Act of 1790, which granted a copyright term of 14 years, with an option to extend for another 14 years if the original author survived to the end of the first term.

    I think there are a few interesting points that tend to get glossed over when it comes to copyright. The first is that copyright is not recognized anywhere in law as a natural right. It is explicitly artificial. The second is that copyright is supposed to be utilitarian in nature; metaphors that treat intellectual property like physical property subject to “natural” property rights are entirely missing the point.

    Finally, the U.S. constitution grants Congress the right to enact copyright laws, but not the obligation. The constitution is silent on the necessity of copyright, it merely leaves the possibility open.

    in reply to: **NSFW** A Few New Tid-Bits From Amy’s Conquest! #99360
    Seldom
    Participant

    Oh no! I’m glad you and your family are unharmed.

    in reply to: Ali Huston Power Lifter With Near Super Human Strength!! #99134
    Seldom
    Participant
    in reply to: Wonder Woman Artwork #98279
    Seldom
    Participant

    Credit where credit is due! http://www.smbc-comics.com/

    in reply to: Cindy Phillips #97500
    Seldom
    Participant

    cpbell0033944 wrote:

    Nah, not a good decision – a physique like hers is a pure BBing one.

    I agree about her physique, she is an astoundingly beautiful and perfectly shaped bodybuilder.

    However, I think she did a good job in her recent post of articulating why the lifestyle of bodybuilding is not for her. It sounds like she’ll be happier training for the physique division.

    And, the eternal optimist in me can’t help hoping that the sport will change to the point where it’s long-term healthier for the competitors, and Cindy wants to be a bodybuilder again!

    in reply to: Megaupload #97210
    Seldom
    Participant

    It’s up to you to decide if their service is worth the cost.

    Personally, to me, it’s not. And I’d be seriously concerned with handing over my credit card number.

    in reply to: Aleesha Young #95070
    Seldom
    Participant

    Is she calling security?

    in reply to: The morpher’s guild has a new member NSFW #95050
    Seldom
    Participant

    Dianne’s BEFOREs look like morphs! What an incredible development!

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 150 total)