Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Hunter S Creek
ParticipantGreat stuff, scat!
Thank you for sharing!
Tschuss!
HunterParticipantI forgot about that site. Thank you for the reminder, Alex.
I can't believe it is still up! She started that back when the BE Archive was still a free site!
Anyone know if she is still visiting the various on-line communities?
Tschuss!
HunterParticipantWelcome!
And, thank you for sharing such a cool link!
Tschuss!
HunterParticipantCan't wait to read more!
Thank you for sharing it!
Tschuss!
HunterParticipantI wasn't "griping", gblock01; I was paraphrasing/referencing "Monty Python And The Holy Grail". My apologies for my obtuse attempt at humor.
Hunter
Participantgblock101:
I visited your site.
I answered the three questions.
I am now waiting to find out if I am going to be allowed to pass or be thrown into the pit of eternal dispair.Hunter
ParticipantGreat stuff, Magnus!
Thank you for sharing!
Tschuss!
HunterParticipantRegarding the survey question and the listed choices — I have a write-in vote — None of the above.
In the overall context of Western society I see female growth taken to an exaggerated degree as little more than Science Fiction or Fantasy. For most folks it does not need to be sexual, pornographic, erotic, or sensual. For many it is simply about the empowerment of a given female character. Of course, others enjoy it because for them it contains a more Id-stimulating undercurrent.
However, one needs to keep in mind that the average person in society who enjoyed "Attack of the Fifty Foot Woman" or "She-Hulk" probably enjoyed them for reasons that differ in principle and intensity from one who is a member of a Female Growth Board or GTS Site. Most of the members of such web sites seem to enjoy them because at some level they have at least some appreciation of the Id-stimulating aspects of female growth.
I believe that it is simply the level of and the degree of that intensity as perceived by a given person that seems to separate those that consider it to be "sexual" or a "fetish" or just a "fantasy", etc.
Similarly, to most people whether or not a given sketch or story is considered "pronographic" is not at all based on the fact that the female character is growing taller, more muscular, or even bustier; it is based on what else she is doing, what she is wearing (or not), and what is being done to her. To paraphrase a famous logic question — If a fully clothed female character is growing alone in the woods: is it sexual, pornographic, erotic, sensual, or none of the above?
Tschuss!
HunterParticipantVery cool work!
Thank you for sharing!
Tschuss!
HunterParticipantThank you for the heads-up, Asusus! I am very much looking forward to the Grand Opening next week!
Tschuss!
Hunter -
AuthorPosts